Federal 'cash for clunckers' must be stopped...VOICE HERE !!

Rat Rods Rule

Help Support Rat Rods Rule:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

ChiefRocka

New member
Joined
Dec 22, 2008
Messages
3
Hope this is posted in the right spot....


This affects all of us-
take a minute to send your thoughts.
I sent one to Nancy, and my state senator as well:




Oppose Federal “Cash for Clunkers” Program

Washington lawmakers are drafting a large economic stimulus package to help create jobs and rebuild infrastructure. They want to include a nationwide scrappage program which would give U.S. tax dollars to consumers who turn-in older cars to have them crushed, as a misguided attempt to spur new car sales. The lawmakers need to scrap this idea.
The stimulus package is being drafted right now. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) wants to introduce the bill on January 6 and have it approved by Congress by January 20, so that President Obama can sign it into law after he is inaugurated.

Contact House Speaker Nancy Pelosi IMMEDIATELY To Oppose Cash for Clunkers!

Call: 202/225-0100
Click here to send an electronic message: http://speaker.house.gov/contact/
__________________________________________
Talking Points
Oppose the Use of U.S. Taxpayer Dollars for Cash for Clunkers
• I am [calling/writing] to urge lawmakers not to include a “Cash for Clunkers” provision in the economic stimulus bill. Owners who turn in vehicles for crushing would receive a "minimal" payment to purchase a new car. This is a misguided attempt to spur car sales and claim that the country’s air quality or fleet fuel mileage is being improved.

• “Cash for Clunkers” programs threaten enthusiasts nationwide with the loss of valuable parts and parts-cars for repair, restoration, and customization projects. The programs also risk destroying classic, historic and special-interest vehicles, our American heritage.

• Cars turned in for scrappage often barely run, or are rarely-driven second or third vehicles that have a minimal impact on overall fuel economy or emissions.

• “Cash for Clunkers” programs will reduce the availability of affordable transportation and repair parts used by low-income drivers. It will also compete with the Salvation Army, the Purple Heart and other charities that rely on vehicle donations to raise money.

• “Cash for Clunkers” ignores better policy options. If Congress wants to act, support for repair and upgrade is a better choice and a win-win for consumers, dealers, manufacturers and repair shops. Significant emissions and fuel economy improvements can be achieved in older vehicles through relatively simple and inexpensive means: repaired/replaced exhaust systems, tune-ups, etc.
• We hope we can count on you to reject “Cash for Clunkers.” Thank you for your consideration on this very important matter.
 
There are "PRO's" & "CON's" all throught life...

We make progress, & here comes "CONGRESS"





I'm gonna abstain from giving my "opinion" on the "Woman" in question.
 
Yeah, that thing is all over the forums and message boards.
2 things, first I hate anything that is fear based manipulation and I also don't like them telling me what opinion to have, I am perfectly capable of reading the information and deciding for myself how I feel about it. If there was any validity to this at all, they lost it by assuming I can't think for myself.
 
There are at least 3 threads about this on RRR alone.

Both environmentally and economically it's a bad idea. The 'environmental impact' of building a new car is far heavier than continuing to run a less efficient vehicle. Economically, the stimulus to replace a 20 year old car with a new one would not change the decision of a significant # of the populous to go ahead and buy new. Those that have an older vehicle generally have them because it is not financially responsible or possible for them to buy a new vehicle, otherwise they would have near new cars already.

It's more like this came from lobbying from the car companies and their corresponding unions.
 
I suppose there would be some trickle down, like the horse market. It used to be any full sized horse would bring $500-$800 as a tanker. A good saddle horse would fetch $1500 and up. Then they legislated that horses couldn't be slaughtered in America and the bottom end of the horse market was gone in a country that is over populated with nags. Nowdays you can't get $800 out of a good horse on most auctions and colts won't even get a bid. That's what manipulating a free market does.
I'm sure part of the logic is to get the old dirty tailpipe cars off the road. If it is all to get more new cars sold then I am not in favour but if it gets crappy used up cars off the streets and out of the trailer courts then I say let 'er rip.
 
I never thought about how bad this can affect us. Imagine all of those great vehicles being tossed in the chopper for no reason at all.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top