I'll just do what we discussed before"
I took that as the authorities might have had instructed him to wait for an officer to arrive and order the child released under state law.
I think that's what occurred last time he had that problem guessing from the rest of what they all said.
I think the parent was correct. they attempted to remove a right by offering 2 alternative options- child leaves unsupervised or has to wait in line with the car... neither of which was acceptable to the parent who did not his child to leave unsupervised or in a car
Parent shows up at school the authority of the parent is supreme and they have to give you custody of your child regardless if school is in session or not.
I'm here for my child...after an identity check yes sir right away is how it should be.
There is no dispensation of authority in the constitution to government only limited and reversible powers
The 10th amendment proscribes that all powers not specifically granted the fed are reserved to the state and to the people. this means that any powers not specifically granted the state also are reserved to the people....
"The people" are the parents
County local and other public institutions all are under state constitutions and are under the powers of the state as per the 10th.
There is no credible argument by which "The People" can be construed to refer to institution.
When a court or legislature refers The People of... (take or order lawful action)
The institution here is NOT the people.
The institution here is an agency of the people given power to perform under the authority of the people
Authority has power but it is not power
Power has no authority
Power is just power..ability or agency
Authority is the right to power
The suffix "Ity" appended to a word creates a new word which itself is defined as a quality or attribute of the root word.
Prosperity is a quality of one who prospers
Author-ity is a quality right or attribute of an author
An author is an exclusive and aboriginal right as reflected in the first amendment to the constitution which enshrines the right to free speech.
An author has the right to chose to speak or not to speak
to chose what he speaks
To act out according to his speech (free agency and to uphold his word)
The writers and signors of the Constitution are not even "The People" but are members of We the people...
Just as a ghost writer who has been hired to perform a work is not the author of that work
The writers and signors of the constitution are not the authors of the constitution
It's important to note that no-where in the constitution is there a dispensation of authority to institution
Also it's important to not that just forming a new government after coming out of the old world.. free also means free as in unbound. not bound to the land contrary to feudalism which binds a person to the land.
The constitution and all law and regulation under the constitution being "the law of the land" rules over the land, what is bound to the land(jurisdiction) like institutions...and what occurs in the land... like commerce and crime...
but not over the people who are free and not bound to the land.
Freeman are above the rule of law and under it's protection
Government being established to secure our liberties... (secure as in protect not as in dispense)
The protection of the law comes not from it's ruling over freemen but from it ruling over that which aggresses or infringes the common liberties of freemen ie criminals and those in institutional positions of power
Furthermore public service is a privilege not a right so one who willingly engages in public service (which is under the rule of law) himself comes under the rule of law.
this is a degree of capitis diminutio
A person in public service does not have as high a legal standing as an otherwise conscripted free man
So IMHO...
The parent here has a "highest and best" claim to take custody of his child than the school does unless the parent has been incriminated and deemed unfit.
