Anybody work in the insurance industry?

[jmlcolorado]

YAY!

I get pretty wordy because it takes me a while to weed out the parts where Irepeat myself trying to hit a bullseye in the idea I’m trying to express

Man, remind me not to negotiate with you on anything
I'd rather you be my friend rather then my foe

 

[sgtpontiac]

I think that Tman should be in sales....

by the time you got down with the spheel, you'd just buy it to get out!!!! Just kidding T.....love your in depth views and commentary.....[cl

 

[Dirtyrat]

Talked to my agent this morning. He said I'm covered regardless of wether it's thru my insurance or hers. My uninsured motorist insurance will cover it and then Allstate will go after her insurance. It may take a little while but I will get tooken care of, Hopefully.

Exactly what they get paid to do, fight for your rights and your compensation in the event of an accident.

 

[21willys]

Well I haven't made much progress other then Allstate is now going after the other insurance company to see what's going on. I got a estimate on my trailer for $3500 to repair it, a $300 estimate for my reece hitch, and I'm waiting on a adjuster to look at my truck now.


It just blows my mind that the insurance company can say this wasn't her fault and that it was a act of god!

 

[Torch]

by the time you got down with the spheel, you'd just buy it to get out!!!! Just kidding T.....love your in depth views and commentary.....[cl

Thanks man.
I'm obsessed with certain topics
I was Listening to Dr Mike Savage one day on the radio and he was talking about books he had written. He said he gets obsessed with a topic and there is a sense of release when he gets it all down on paper it's like a data dump that clears his head>
So I’m inspired by that and decided to write a book and that idea is forming my thoughts into some coherency.
I've always been interested in history and as a result of my incarceration in my youth in the law and the evolution of law.
In my opinion Law has to have some philosophical technicality to weave it into the web of justice as if each statute, ruling, regulation, determination, etc must act as a new piece of a machine. New additions may replace or make redundant previous inventions but they must fit and it must bring greater efficiency to the purpose of the machine.
That's where politics complicates the law...
The purpose...
At it's origins the law was nothing more than one strong person or a group of people telling another person what to do.
The argument for governance has always been a simple one "Do what you are told or perish"
The evolution of man to reach this imposition was evident in Cain slaying able
Or if you're not religious... The turning of ones instinctual violence and hunting skills against another human to control.
Work is pain and man has always sought more effective ways of translating his pain upon others.
The evolution of law has been one of; from an aggression of liberty to a shield of liberty.
The argument of the strong man (because I can) was a physical evolution
The argument justifying liberty has takes thousands of years of social evolution to develop.

On occasion I hear people in other nations say "The only thing that stands in the way of world peace and global government is the US Constitution"
It always offends me but I could never articulate my offense. These people never get into why they believe that, probably because they were programmed to believe it rather than deciding to.
It has taken me years to answer that question but I have achieved success.
The key to direct my mind to the understanding I learned when I heard someone say "people throughout the world are subjects of their governments only Americans are truly citizens."

I've been able to put it into a chiasmus... a form of poetry where 2 things from one statement are exchanged changing the meaning of the second statement.
You can take the boy out of the country
but you can't take the country out of the boy
Chi the Greek letter X.. if you draw a line for each word from where it is in the first sentence to where it is in the second the 2 lines form an X.
Boy and Country are the subjects of the chiasmus and the pivot point, the message is the underlying idea created by the chiasmus that is not explicit in either sentence.
You’re speaking of something indirectly which is hidden in knowing what it is like to be a country boy.
I first head of Chiastic poems listening to NPR one night while trucking
That's how a chiasmus works
It's sometimes referred to as circular reasoning bringing the conversation full circle around a central crux of the matter.

For further understanding of Chiasmus Read: Chiasmus in Ancient Greek and Latin Literatures
http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/books/?bookid=111&chapid=1294

SO... what is my Chiasmus?

"Prior to 1776 and today beyond the jurisdiction of American Justice, Law throughout the world remains the rule of the strong man purposed to PROTECT ESTABLISHMENT AND RULE OVER THE INDIVIDUAL.
Through 1776 When we British in the colonies threw off our king and reclaimed the aboriginal individual sovereignty our ancestors had surrendered to kings we engineered new law WHOLLY INCOMPATIBLE with the law in the rest of the world in that this new law is purposed to PROTECT THE INDIVIDUAL AND RULE OVER ESTABLISHMENT".- Michael Ederer

Since the law throughout the world is for the protection of government and to rule over the people...
Since the government throughout the world is above the law and the people are subject to the law under the rule of government or the rule of law and ultimately subject to their leaders,
they remain under the rule of the strong man
as it has been since the first institution of government.
The rule of the strong man may be beneficial or it may become a tyranny
but it is still in it's essence and structure the opposite of how the law is structured according to American Justice.

The simplest form of the idea without the context and back ground is this:
I call what happened in 1776 a Chiastic inversion in the relationship between Institution and the individual (as far as I know) unprecedented in Human History


Most of the problems we have faced in our history can be directly attributed to people's inability to break free from their programming to implement this new body of law we engineered in 1776.
People remain programmed into believing that they are under the law and that government is sovereign.
That the law empowers and justifies some folks to do bad things and take things away from other people.
Prejudice and marginalization of peoples is a throwback to the old world way of society.
you could take this chiastic inversion in the relationship between the individual and institution and find a great many contradictions in our law to argue against it.

This does not make me the hypocrite.

I believe the reason for the hypocrisy in our history is simply because people have not learned the truth as I was never taught the truth; As I had to learn it for myself through years of investigation.

 

[Torch]

So the book i am writing is centered around this legal and philosophical revolution in 1776...
I'm not going to get into every contradiction that has happened since then because the purpose of the book is to raise an incorruptible standard.
it's possible the founders or some of them who achieved this may have not even been aware of the full meaning of what they had done as most people are not today.
The reason I'm putting this together is I was able to see a transformation of our nation into what we had freed ourselves from.
I could see where it was going but it took me forever to figure out exactly what we had that we did not know we had.
or what we could have had.

The simplest definition of the word standard is a flag.
It is the thing you look up to in battle, that you swear allegiance to...
So of course I am being idealistic... a standard represents your ideals.

I came up with a pretty cool name for the book.
"Liber A Merak" or "Liber Amerrick" or maybe just American Justice.
American Justice was something mankind had been struggling to achieve for many generations but when they came into contact with the free peoples of America, the Indians...the lights came on and they now "knew" what they were looking for.
Our constitution itself is inspired by Indian law..the Iroquois constitution>
The reference in our constitution to "a more perfect union" is not one to perfect our previous union.
If what I learned from the Indians is correct, It's taken from a quote of Benjamin Franklin I believe who said "If the savages to the north of us can form a perfect union than we should be able to form a more perfect union"

I've read that America has had it's name since even before Amerigo Vespucci or the Brit by the name of Merrick who discovered north America>
I read somewhere long ago that the Templars referred to the land to the west across the see the land of the western star, the land A Merack.
Merak is a star in the bear constellation in which we find the big dipper and the north star.
Merak's anatomically correct name comes from an Arabic phrase meaning "the flank of the Greater Bear."
Traditionally Russia and northern Europe has been given the symbolism in scripture of the great bear.
So it is conceivable that ancient Phoenician and even more believable that seagoing Templars (who were familiar with Arabic) may have named America "the land of Merak" 100 years before columbus sailed since it flanks Northern Europe across the oceans.
It's a fact that Columbus's Pilot was guided by a controversial map.
Merak if I'm right sometimes appears both to the west and sometimes to the east of the north star...
It's the second star in the cup of the dipper opposite and flanking the north star
The continent of North America is at both flanks of norther Eurasia.
Pre Islamic Arabs were astronomers ie the three wise men following the star to Bethlehem
Oceans are not barriers they are highways.

 

[Willowbilly3]

I think it would be time to go to town and open up a big can of whup-a** on some insurance stoogys.
I hate insurance, it's one of the biggest scams ever to get poured out on a society. If it wasn't a better deal for the big insurance companies than it is for you, they darn sure wouldn't be doing it, just like slot machines. It's also a big part of what has made us a sue happy nation with a victim mentality.
Personally, if I was king of the world, there wouldn't be any liability insurance. YOU assume the risk everytime you go out on the road so insure yourself for whatever you feel you need. Vehicles with no insurance would be clearly marked so you made your own choice to ride in it or stay out of the way.
21Willys, this isn't pointed at you in any way, just my personal feelings on a corrupt system. The law makes you have it, you pay and pay, year in and year out, on time. Then when it's time for them to pay a claim, they pull this kind of crap. It's as criminal as you or I not having insurance, that's for sure.

 

[21willys]

I was in my agents office today so I asked about my claim. He made a few calls and was told they was waiting on the letter from the other lady's insurance denieing the claim. They already told me that they got this letter a month ago!!! So once again I'm waiting on someone to do their job.

I also found out that my insurance won't pay pain and suffering. I'm not sure if they are going to pay lost wages or not.

I'm just going to get a lawyer when I get back to Illinios. I'm over it!