Neto
Well-known member
There are a few (at least) members here who are also on the P15-D24 forum, but I don't know if you're a member there, and if so, if you've posted your questions there. (It started as "strictly" MoPars of the 46 to 48 model run, but with openness to earlier & later models an increasing trend, so there are now lots of guys there with MoPars up into the middle 50's.)
The reason I pointed out the serrations is because on mine, that is designed to press into the upper part of the hinge frame (or what ever it should be called - the part that is fastened into the pillar) and prevent the pin from turning there. On my car, when the doors were (presumably) left closed for years, the pin rusted fast into the tongue, or strap part of the hinge. Then when someone forced the door open, it twisted off the pin right below the serrations. The bottom hole in the hinge frame is a loose fit, because the pin has to pass through the hole in the tongue or strap. The serrated part of the pin is a larger diameter. So just going by what I saw on mine, IF the design was the same, then I'd guess that the same situation on your car resulted in the upper hinge frame hole becoming stripped out (instead of twisting off the head, as in my case). But I think that either approach will work fine, and in some ways, making the pivot point in the outer frame holes is the better design, because those points are wider (more spread out). (And also a lot easier to keep lubricated.) That type of hinge-pin design would then commonly have bushings in those two rotation points, correct?
The reason I pointed out the serrations is because on mine, that is designed to press into the upper part of the hinge frame (or what ever it should be called - the part that is fastened into the pillar) and prevent the pin from turning there. On my car, when the doors were (presumably) left closed for years, the pin rusted fast into the tongue, or strap part of the hinge. Then when someone forced the door open, it twisted off the pin right below the serrations. The bottom hole in the hinge frame is a loose fit, because the pin has to pass through the hole in the tongue or strap. The serrated part of the pin is a larger diameter. So just going by what I saw on mine, IF the design was the same, then I'd guess that the same situation on your car resulted in the upper hinge frame hole becoming stripped out (instead of twisting off the head, as in my case). But I think that either approach will work fine, and in some ways, making the pivot point in the outer frame holes is the better design, because those points are wider (more spread out). (And also a lot easier to keep lubricated.) That type of hinge-pin design would then commonly have bushings in those two rotation points, correct?