Finally, we have got to get assualt weapons out of the hands of criminals and kids. Every gangbanger in every town is either carrying a 9mm or an AK47. We have had a ton of shootings here locally this past year and most of them involve weapons that spit out rounds as fast as they can pull the trigger, or have been converted to automatic illegally.
Don
I'm with you on kids not having access to firearms without supervision except for those cases like where a young girl babysitting was able to save her own life and the lives of her siblings by access to a firearm during a home intrusion.
A bullet is supposed to come out when you pull the trigger....
And they are not supposed to come out when you don't pull the trigger...
looks like the guns work perfectly
Criminals are not members of society
How is assaulting society going to change criminals?
We wouldn't have a gang problem if they didn't have something illegal to sell or unarmed people to take advantage of
Not less than a year ago a guy that went postal had police pinned down with a single shot bolt action and his neighbor who had him flanked shot him with a revolver
When Adam's mother went looking for help she should have gotten it instantly
We have fusion centers compiling information on every citizen, why didn't they cross reference his mothers assertion he was unstable with the attempted gun purchases and investigate if he was a threat?
Are fusion centers using intelligence to identify and investigate threats or politically to control people and punish whistle blowers?
Politicians are trying to put the handcuffs on the wrong people,but then again it's always easier to punish the innocent or the weak than it is to go after the violent and dangerous...
Let them get away with it and you end up as human shields between the cops and the criminals.
A 9mm is popular but no more dangerous than any other calibur, How does popularity make a particular gun more deadly?
The federal government last year bought over 1 billion rounds of hollow point ammo illegal for use in warfare but entirely legal for creating terminal woulds in living targets.
Is the purpose for shooting a perpetrator to arrest him or to kill him?
The constitution says the decision to kill belongs to a jury.
Hollow-points, and previous iterations of expanding bullets, have drawn special attention since as far back as the St. Petersburg Declaration of 1886, which outlawed exploding projectiles in international warfare. In 1899, the Hague Convention specifically banned the use of bullets that expand or flatten in the body.
Creeps crave power. The smarter ones, they seek out positions of power>
The people have surrendered control of their government. They don't even have a clue what the boundaries were and what we have is so far off the reservation...
Considering everything the government has done that violates the constitution or in other words is unlawful, considering all the illegal laws, the illegal actions that don;t even have the support of illegal laws...
In the light of everything they have already done that is a matter of record according to their own documents where no-one gets punished and everyone looks the other way...
What is it that they could be planning that is so insidious they don't feel comfortable initiating it until the people are disarmed?
If we can tolerate all that they have done so far what is on the table that we would not tolerate?
I think the police in CT were top notch and did an excellent job and there was nothing anyone could have done to prevent this except those people close to the murderer before it happened.
He suicided without engaging the police. If he was armed less effectively it would not have expedited the situation
If he had automatic weapons it most likely would not have extended the conflict, he chose suicide over conflict.
He probably could have killed 20 or 30 people with a machete in the same amount of time, even more with pipe bombs or poison gas so you really can't say a wholesale gun ban would have prevented this.
Why do these things always happen when socialists are in control of government?
Why is it always a crazy person on drugs who either everyone that knew was bonkers or the murder was never know to be crazy before or after and claimed they were drugged and forced to do it?
automatic weapons are not as deadly as single shot weapons except for when you are faced with multiple engagements at close range in tight quarters.
On the streets an automatic weapon is most likely to hit an unintended target than to hit who the bullets were intended to kill.
If you can't weld good weld alot...
If you can't shoot good shoot alot?
neither of these 2 theories work out so yeah I'm against machine guns on the street
machine guns are automatic weapons
Semi automatic weapons are not machine guns but people being so easy to control can be easily led to feel the same emotions about single shot weapons that recock themselves that they have about machine guns.
Controlling people is done through their emotions
People think their thoughts are their own like they think their feelings are their own.
In actuality feelings are involuntary instinctual reactions to environment.
A thinking person can control a feeling person simply by controlling their environment.
People either feel or think
They might have feelings about their thoughts
Or they might have thoughts about their feelings
But they don't feel and think at the same time, by this I mean either one process or the other wins out and directs the person.
And when you flood people with emotions it is so much easier to do their thinking for them.
When you flood them with strong emotions most of them don't think at all
