Paul_J
Well-known member
Well I for one am looking forward to whatever that next step is going to be!
I am a little concerned that if I run mounts that extend way inwards toward the motor that it will try and twist the frame.
The distance from the crank to the frame rails will be the same no matter how you set up your mounts - so torque on the frame will be the same no matter where it is mounted to the motor. Maybe I am misunderstanding your concern?
Warren Nethercote said:Flipper,
It looks like there might be room to run across-member under the engine below the motor mounts. The mounts could go to the cross member and the cross member would not put the same twisting loads on the frame rails as direct attachment of the motor mounts.
(Edit next day: Here is a sketch of what I mean: essentially link your fabricated mounts by a piece of RHS. This tube would reduce the torsional loads on the frame rails, and because the loads on the tube would be largely tension (bending too, but mostly tension I suspect) I think you could get away with 1 or 1 1/2 x whatever tubing. Thus, this cross member would not be as robust as the main suspension cross member)
Enter your email address to join: