05snopro440
Well-known member
I like the chopped panel with B-pillar and rear window leaned forward. It probably the cheapest way to go.
The cheapest way to go is not chopping it.
I like the chopped panel with B-pillar and rear window leaned forward. It probably the cheapest way to go.
I don't disagree with any of the above, snopro. Unlike the Mopar cars of this period the wagon looks right. The main reason for the pillar lean would be to get away from the "Pill box" look.Almost bought one of those several years ago, I've always liked them. The guy wanted way too much at the time. Personally, I like the roof stock height, I just think it has such good proportions already. I've seen a couple in person where they've kept the stock height but modified the rear side glass to be one full fixed piece of glass and I feel that's the one modification that really improves the looks of these cars. Sweeping the posts looks good but it removes the style charm of the era, to me. Just my 2 cents.
Keep us posted!
My mom had one back in the late '60s. One night I borrowed it. It was the only time I recall getting pulled over for driving to slowly. We were distracted. I think... [S The recollection is kind of foggy.
I wouldn't mind being seen in one now.
I like the chopped panel with B-pillar and rear window leaned forward. It probably the cheapest way to go.
The cheapest way to go is not chopping it.
So Torchie, the Dodge is gonna feel unloved. What's the boss think'n about this.
Yes it's all flat, Crank.
There have been a few of these chopped,(probably more then a few. According to the internet) the problem I have with most of them is that they chop them too much. Makes them look like a rolling pill box to me.
If I were to chop it, IF, I said. 3 inches at the A pillar. Most likely the same at the rear because they are boxy. Where I would do it differently would be to angle the B pillar (or all the pillars) to give it more of a "Nomad" type look as well as a bit more lean to the rear pillar/ upper hatch area.
Then of courseI'd probably want to give it a section too. Oh mama...stop me.[ddd
So if your bored Crank. break out the photo shop.....
[P [P [P
Torchie
Can't see it, Doc. Likely a permissions issue. All I see is this:
As a general rule, don't chop wagons.
They're very hard to get "right" and way too easy to get wrong. And when they're wrong, they're awful.
99% of the time they just look like they've been stepped on...
As a general rule, don't chop wagons.
They're very hard to get "right" and way too easy to get wrong. And when they're wrong, they're awful.
99% of the time they just look like they've been stepped on...
bob. At this time no call back from the brother about it so either he doesn't want to sell or we missed connections. It's supposed to be good weather on Friday. Time for a return visit.If you flip it, I'm trying real hard not to be the flipee.
Torchie, you look at them like I do. Most folks chop too much, and it makes the body look fat, and sometimes fat and too long.
To me, you only want to take out enough to change the lines a bit. You want people to look at it and know it’s different, but have to look hard to figure out what. To me, a custom should be slight mods, smoothing, and getting the lines all flowing together. Canted headlights, goofy toothed grilles, and too large tail lights destroy the look. You want everything to appear like it was made that way, but you also want it to be different. It’s a fine line that most people miss....
In my humble opinion the objective of customizing is to make the vehicle look better, not just different. Many times different isn't better.
Enter your email address to join: